Researched by Thomas DeMichelePublished - January 14, 2016 Last Updated - February 25, 2020
Are the Ice Caps Melting?
Data shows that the polar ice caps are melting due to both natural and human factors. Data comes from NASA satellites and is accepted by skeptics and climate change advocates alike.
This isn’t to say that every blip of data on sea ice and land ice spells catastrophe, but it does indicate that when we aggregate the data we see trends of polar ice caps melting at accelerated rates (on average over time, especially since the 1970s; not each year).
This melting is at least in part due to an increase in the earth’s average temperature AKA “global warming,” which is thought to be impacted by human Carbon Dioxide production (and the release of other greenhouses gasses into the atmosphere from both human activity and natural occurrences).
Largest Areas of Agreement and Disagreement About Polar Ice Caps and Global Warming
All sides of this debate focus on the impact of climate change.
Many people believe that the ice caps are melting and that melting ice caps have negative effects. Most also agree that humans are contributing to the problem via global warming (the greenhouse effect that makes the earth’s average temperature rise).
The fact that we are coming to the end of a geological ice age should also be taken into account.
Ultimately, all sides of the argument are based on data NASA satellite data collected since 1979 (and ice chunks studied since the 50’s), which show a long-term decline of global sea ice and land ice. Polar ice naturally recedes and grows in cycles, but data suggests this is not a purely natural decline and instead is correlating with other “climate change” data to paint a troubling picture.
BOTTOMLINE: The ice caps appear to be melting at what seems to be a greater rate than would be expected. Everything from how we measured temperatures in the past, to the natural ebbs and flows, to other factors are taken into account. To what extent this is natural versus manmade and to what extent it is a problem, is where the contention lies.
NASA | Climate Change: A Warming World.
TIP: “Skeptics” tend not to trust NASA because NASA is the government. The problem is that we rely on NASA’s collective funding to study climate issues, so rejecting their information based on bias makes the discussion very tricky. Unless you are going to travel to the poles and start studying ice yourself, it’s probably bad practice to dismiss all of NASA’s raw data. See an explainer of bias as a concept if you are curious as to how this skews the argument.
TIP: Part of what releases greenhouse gasses (like methane) into the atmosphere is permafrost melting. That means the melting of the icecaps can, in theory, create a cycle that accelerates global warming. With that in mind, the earths ecosystem can’t be considered in isolation, there are many complex factors to consider (like to what well our atmosphere can absorb greenhouse gasses without warming).
Ice Cap Melt: Fact Vs. Theory
When lots of facts and data point to something being true, we call it a theory. When we know something for certain, we call it a fact. The more facts and data that point to a theory, the stronger that theory becomes.
In this respect, it is a fact that the data points to the ice cap melting, and
it is a well substantiated theory that the ice caps are melting.
To prove for certain that the icecaps are melting requires us to have lots of empirical evidence over time. Right now we simply have data pointing to ice cap melt.
The more data that comes out, the more certain we can be of what is happening.
Satellite data shows that since the late 1970s, Arctic sea ice extent has decreased by about 12% per decade.
That is the sort of data used to draw the conclusion that the ice caps are melting (similar data is used to conclude that this is due, at least in part, to human impacted climate change).
With science we always want to look for data that will prove us wrong, not just data that proves us right. At the same time, we want to take the data we do have seriously.
Below are a few charts showing data from NASA’s satellites, which measure the ebbs and flows of polar ice growth and recession. The data shows a long-term decline of global sea ice of about 5.5% (note this is GLOBAL sea ice, not land ice). What is more telling than global sea ice is the average monthly arctic sea ice data (as Antarctic sea ice acts differently than Arctic). What is most troubling is the implication of the data: that polar land ice is melting.
Updated NASA satellite data that skeptics use to show ice caps aren’t melting. This ignores the fact that the sea ice problem is partially hidden by Arctic sea ice remaining consistent. Source.
What Does it Mean That the Ice Caps are Melting?
Every year it gets hot, the ice melts, that warms the water, then it gets cold, ice freezes, and that cools the water. When the ice melts more rapidly then it freezes it causes a chain reaction that results in melting ice caps over time. If the ice caps melt too much, it will cover most of the earth in water. That is bad.
There are a number of other climate changes caused by melting polar ice, this compounds the problem of studying the effects in isolation, and can result in the caps gaining elevation as snow and rain fall on top of the caps. No side single side effect or natural ebb or flow explains away the rest of the data or hints that the ice caps aren’t actually melting.
FACT: According to 2000 facts sheet from NASA, together, Greenland and Antarctica contain about 75% of the world’s fresh water (also quoted as 68.7% by water.usgs.gov). That is only a little under 2% of the world’s total water, but it is enough to raise sea level by over 75 meters, if all the ice were returned to the oceans. Imagine that water was in the ocean instead of sitting on top of it as ice at the poles.
The ice caps are melting because the earth’s average temperature is rising (global warming). This means the cold needed to keep the ice frozen isn’t sustained for long enough to do its job. This can and does happen naturally, but according to sources like NASA, the current average temperature increase can’t be explained by natural cycles alone.
Sea Ice, Land Ice, and What is Happening in the Poles
There are two types of polar ice: sea ice and land ice.
Antarctic sea ice extent is increasing
Antarctic land ice mass is decreasing
Arctic sea ice extent is pretty much staying consistent
Arctic land ice mass is decreasing
The Arctic and Antarctic are both reacting differently, but both are actually signaling that there is a problem.
In the Arctic, the land ice is melting and the sea ice is spreading out in cold weather and retreating in warm setting record maximums and minimums.
In the Antarctic, land ice is melting, but sea ice is remaining consistent. The Antarctic has a different climate and is harder to study, so we are more certain about the Arctic.
The NASA data above is on sea ice, but land ice is much more troublesome. Ice already in the sea (not on top of it per-say), isn’t going to raise water levels like land ice. Both ice types pose issues, and the issues are complex. But, this is important to note, as both sides will purposely use the differences to make their points sound valid. For instance, in 2015 sea ice didn’t rescind as much as 2014, so skeptics used it as proof there was no problem while the other side underplayed it.
NASA reported in 2015 that “sea ice in the Arctic has been declining at a rate of 9% per decade for the past 30 years, whereas Antarctica has been losing land ice at a rate of more than 100 km3 per year since 2002.”
According to NASA in February 2015, “As a whole, the planet has been shedding sea ice at an average annual rate of 13,500 square miles (35,000 square kilometers) since 1979, the equivalent of losing an area of sea ice larger than the state of Maryland every year.” Even though Antarctic sea ice reached a new record maximum this past September, global sea ice is still decreasing. That’s because the decreases in Arctic sea ice far exceed the increases in Antarctic sea ice.NOTE: rates slowed over 2015, so the number is a little less drastic with the full 2015 factored in.
“Even though Antarctic sea ice reached a new record maximum this past September, global sea ice is still decreasing,” said Claire Parkinson, author of the study and climate scientist at NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Md. “That’s because the decreases in Arctic sea ice far exceed the increases in Antarctic sea ice.”
I went into this kind of hoping I would discover that the data was overstated or wrong. That is not my takeaway, although I reserve room to be proved wrong (after-all data showing that the ice-caps are melting isn’t the same as proving everything related to the climate change and ice cap melt debate).
My takeaway is that climate skeptics essentially know global warming is a problem to some extent, but many don’t think it’s “that bad”, and are using confusion to hinder what could very well be oppressive regulation. On the same note, it’s likely that those who want more regulation have their own agenda. Also, we can’t rule out bias and how people are reacting to data without conscious motive at all.
Motives and bias aside, the ice caps seem to be melting (for real, for real). This, natural or not, should be taken seriously in a way that doesn’t cause catastrophe down the road. Catastrophe could look like Water World, or it could look like Atlas Shrugged as we over-react and scramble for a solution later than ideal. By acting now we have greater control over what change looks like, that is in our interest regardless of party lines.
To be fair, and so anyone researching this has both sides of the argument. Here is the rock star of Youtube skepticism Stefan Molyneux. As one commenter put it “….this is lunacy. You would have made a great Tobacco lobby ‘expert’, the for hire merchants of doubt. After all, “four out of five doctors recommend Camels”…
Thomas DeMichele is the content creator behind ObamaCareFacts.com, FactMyth.com, CryptocurrencyFacts.com, and other DogMediaSolutions.com and Massive Dog properties. He also contributes to MakerDAO and other cryptocurrency-based projects. Tom's focus in all...