Researched by Thomas DeMichelePublished - January 1, 2016 Last Updated - December 20, 2016
Are Humans Naturally Selfish? Are Humans Naturally Compassionate?
Humans are born both selfish and compassionate; we are hardwired to show compassion to our group and fear to those outside it. It’s genetic self-interest.[1][2] In other words, it’s a myth that humans are only naturally selfish (or vice-versa that we are only naturally compassionate.)
Babies are born both naturally selfish and compassionate, the rest is nurture
A baby doesn’t have to be taught to empathize with those who are in charge of caring for it (their in-group), and it doesn’t have to be taught to fear strangers (their out-group).[4] Most babies seem to react negatively to people who are strangers and positively to a known person or group of people.
Both compassion and fear are genetically hardwired to ensure the survival of the baby and it’s “in-group”. Beyond this, humans learn by nurture, not nature, how to extend their compassion to those outside their group, or likewise how to extend their “hate” to strangers outside their group.
FACT: Disgust is one of the most fundamental naturally hardwired emotions. It’s universal to all languages. Whether it’s different out-groups, yucky foods, or icky potential mates, disgust is an effective tool for survival (and an uncomfortable truth behind prejudice).
Is the Selfish Gene Theory True?
The selfish gene theory has truth to it, but it is ultimately misleading.[5]
We are born selfish in some ways, but ultimately it is selfishness on behalf of the species (not the individual). This could just as easily be described as being genetically “selfless” (the selfless gene). The fact is, humans are cooperative by nature, just like all life, and sometimes cooperation manifests as competition.
It’s probably more accurate to simply say, humans are complex and have both selfish and selfless traits. We are hardwired for cooperation and competition, we are hardwired to be selfish and compassionate, but all of this is simply in the interest of our genes. Beyond this, it’s simply a matter of nurture.
Do we teach others to have a small in-group, or do we teach them to extend compassion? There has historically been, unsurprisingly, two schools of thought. With that in mind, here is Richard Dawkins explaining his take on “the selfish gene”.
We come hardwired to be both “selfish” and “compassionate”, beyond this nurture plays a big role.
Don’t forget, if you are old enough to read this article, you are old enough to nurture yourself and define your “in-group” as humanity and you’re old enough to realize that the “out-group” can be in.
Thomas DeMichele is the content creator behind ObamaCareFacts.com, FactMyth.com, CryptocurrencyFacts.com, and other DogMediaSolutions.com and Massive Dog properties. He also contributes to MakerDAO and other cryptocurrency-based projects. Tom's focus in all...
Humans are inherently selfish by birth, A baby does not allow another baby to take milk from mother. They are possessive of toys, dress……. If mother cuddles another baby, the first baby will not like it. So on………..
I really don’t know what causes me to think of myself, instead of others.
Sometimes I just think of others instead of myself. And it can really become confusing to what kind of a person I am – selfish or selfless. Judgement still remains in the face of both these concepts and they can only manifest themselves through circumstance(diverse). I don’t know, it doesn sound like a myth or a fact to me.. It’s a complex case like love and hate.
I agree, upon research we found data pointing to people being naturally selfish and naturally compassionate. It doesn’t manifest the same way in everyone, but it does hint that we need to embrace both aspects and account for both in civil society and our social relationships.
Reba Supports this as a Fact.
Fact
Reddy KM Supports this as a Fact.
Humans are inherently selfish by birth, A baby does not allow another baby to take milk from mother. They are possessive of toys, dress……. If mother cuddles another baby, the first baby will not like it. So on………..
Thomas DeMicheleThe Author Did not vote.
Indeed, they are both selfish and compassionate. Our dualistic nature in action from the moment we are born.
We are not A or B, we are “in a state of superposition” so to speak. 😉
Ofentse Keith Mokwana Did not vote.
I really don’t know what causes me to think of myself, instead of others.
Sometimes I just think of others instead of myself. And it can really become confusing to what kind of a person I am – selfish or selfless. Judgement still remains in the face of both these concepts and they can only manifest themselves through circumstance(diverse). I don’t know, it doesn sound like a myth or a fact to me.. It’s a complex case like love and hate.
Thomas DeMicheleThe Author Did not vote.
I agree, upon research we found data pointing to people being naturally selfish and naturally compassionate. It doesn’t manifest the same way in everyone, but it does hint that we need to embrace both aspects and account for both in civil society and our social relationships.
Karsten Did not vote.
Last sentence: It’s “you’re old enough to realize”, not “your old enough to realize”.
Thomas DeMicheleThe Author Did not vote.
Very good point. Thanks for catching that.