Did Machiavelli Actually Say, “the Ends Justify the Means?”
Consequentialism is the philosophical idea that “the ends justify the means”, this sounds good on paper at first, but in practice it is a slippery slope to despotism and immoral horrors (see Hitler, eugenics, and other fun stuff like that).
A simple maxim like this is bound for revision, and certainly later utilitarian theories of Bentham and Mill (not to mention Aristotle’s original utilitarian theory in his Ethics) essentially refute this idea. So it is no surprise Machiavelli, the Father of modern Political science, presents a more complex argument than the famous, but overly simplistic, quote eludes.
Men judge generally more by the eye than by the hand, because it belongs to everybody to see you, to few to come in touch with you. Every one sees what you appear to be, few really know what you are, and those few dare not oppose themselves to the opinion of the many, who have the majesty of the state to defend them; and in the actions of all men, and especially of princes, which it is not prudent to challenge, one judges by the result.
For that reason, let a prince have the credit of conquering and holding his state, the means will always be considered honest, and he will be praised by everybody because the vulgar are always taken by what a thing seems to be and by what comes of it; and in the world there are only the vulgar, for the few find a place there only when the many have no ground to rest on.
In other words, Machiavelli is saying “one judges by the results”… which sort of fits with the idea that the Prince is essentially written as satire. It is written to look like a realist guidebook for hereditary princes, but was actually a set of Machiavellian tactics for virtuous leaders who lacked the criminal virtue needed to ensure power in a world full of con men and tyrants. As Rousseau says, “his is the book of Republicans”.
In words, Machiavelli is hinting that “if a virtuous leader came along to overthrow a tyrant by force, that the ends would justify the means, that they would be judged by the results, not the action of overthrowing”… but he is also just using backhanded language to lambast the Medici family who had him arrested, tortured, and exiled from government when they took over his Republican Florence and turned it into a a hereditary principality.
PHILOSOPHY – Ethics: Consequentialism [HD].
DO THE ENDS JUSTIFY THE MEANS? The ends can sometimes justify the means, sure! And the ends are often more important than the means. And sometimes, one must muster up criminal virtue to ensure an ends which brings the “greatest happiness”… but one must understand, we are talking about “greatest happiness” theory here. And thus, people look to rule-Consequentialism (where we consider the morality of the means, not just the ends). Machiavelli as a political great, virtuous master, and Republican would no doubt apply the same sort of reason to the seeking of a more perfect happiness theory.
An Introduction to Niccolò Machiavelli’s The Prince- A Macat Politics Analysis.
ALL STATES, all powers, that have held and hold rule over men have been and are either republics or principalities. – The first line of the Prince
“… the governments of the people are better than those of princes.” Book I, Chapter LVIII of Livy